EDEGBE ODEMWINGIE, OLAOLU OLADIPO, ADESUWA TSAN, and AHURAKA ISAH
Mr. Femi Otedola, chairman of Zenon Petroleum and Gas, yesterday
appeared before the House Committee on Ethics and Privileges to defend
his bribery allegations against the former chairman of the ad-hoc
committee investigating the management of fuel subsidy funds but refused
to make any presentation.
The closed-door meeting, which lasted about an hour and 30 minutes,
was however fruitless as Otedola refused to testify before the committee
unless its proceedings were done in the full glare of the public.
A smiling Otedola, clad in his traditional all white attire, backed
by his team of lawyers led by his legal adviser, Jide Koku, SAN, emerged
from the venue of the hearing to a barrage of questions by reporters,
followed by angry lawmakers who were of the opinion that he had no right
to appear with his lawyers and to speak to the press on what transpired
in the closed-door session.
Jide, who spoke on behalf of Otedola, queried the decision of the
lawmakers to renege on their earlier stand to make the hearing public,
maintaining that he (Otedola) would not speak or make any presentations
until it is made open.
A press release signed by the businessman to that effect stated:
“This is a matter that has generated a lot of public interest and
controversy. The House of Representatives committee on the management of
fuel subsidy headed by Hon Farouk Lawan held all its sittings in
public. When the issue arose, the House of Representatives Committee on
Ethics and Privileges publicly stated that its investigations would be
held in public.
“It is therefore surprising and curious that this committee has made a
u-turn to hold its investigative sittings in camera, particularly in
the light of unfolding events. I strongly believe that the interest of
the public will not be best served if this investigation is held in
camera.
“I have nothing to hide and will only speak on this issue when this
investigation is conducted in a very transparent manner and the press as
well as the general public are allowed to be present at the sittings of
this committee from the beginning of its investigation to its
conclusion.”
Expressing its displeasure after the meeting, the Committee on Ethics
and Privileges led by its chairman, Hon Gambo Dan Musa, described the
attitude of Otedola as “stupid”.
He said that as a standing committee of the House of Representatives,
it reserves the right to choose the method with which it will conduct
its proceedings in line with the provisions of the constitution and
Standing Orders of the House.
The lawmaker said, “the tradition of the committee is to hold its meetings in-camera”.
He added, “He (Otedola) came with lawyers and other paraphernalia and
we still allowed them because we wanted to show that we are a committee
that wants the truth.”
He said the decision to “insult them and not answer their questions
was a misguided step. “He was misguided either by his lawyers or by
whoever is advising him because it is one thing to agree to come and
another to refuse to talk. We did all that was within our power yet,
Femi Otedola refused to answer our questions and said we should make it
public unless he won’t talk.
“We didn’t find it funny and he went further to insult us one way or
the other, but we still exercised patience with him. You can’t make an
allegation and, when asked to substantiate, refuse to”.
Going further, he lamented, “ he told us we had something to hide by
holding it in camera but we told him that, rather, he had something to
hide by refusing to substantiate his claims”.
According to the chairman, the businessman also told them that Farouk
lied four times during his presentation to the committee and that “all
that was submitted to us were not genuine as if he had seen them”.
“We asked him to produce what he said he had submitted to the police
and SSS, that we would admit it as evidence but he refused. Ladies and
gentlemen, how do you investigate a matter of this nature when someone
says he has given out something but refuses to talk?”
Although he claimed he wasn’t angry, the lawmaker who was visibly
livid said: “He was just laughing. It was very stupid of him and we are
not finding it funny. ....He told us he is a businessman and he is not
hungry. Do we look hungry to you? It is important to note that our
position is that we have done all we were supposed to do.”
Bribery: TV station airs second audio conversation between Otedola, Lawan
In a related development, a Lagos based television station, Channels
Television, yesterday aired what it termed the second audio conversation
between the suspended Chairman of the House of Representatives ad-hoc
committee probing the subsidy regime in the petroleum sector, Mr. Farouk
Lawan, and a businessman, Mr. Femi Otedola.
The one-minute, 52 seconds long conversation formed part of the 5pm
news bulletin of the station tagged, “News At Five”, where the two spoke
about the need to make their dealing secret and confidential.
Second tape is full of comedy - Farouk
Meanwhile, Lawan’s lawyer has denounced the so-called Part 2 of the
alleged conversation between him and Otedola in the case of the $620,
000 bribery allegation played on Channels TV.
Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), Lawan’s lead lawyer, said he was portrayed
in the said conversation as an unyielding, talkative, bellicose and
eager person who was hurriedly urging Mr Otedola not to tell anyone that
the names of his companies would be removed from the indicted list,
because if he went about telling people that “in an oil sector that is a
small world where everyone knows the other, it will be difficult to
remove his companies from the list of indicted ones”.
In a statement issued by Ozekhome, the lawyer said the tape reminded
him of Baba Sala’s “Alawada Keri Keri” histrionics and comedy, adding:
“It is even more obfuscating and labyrinthine. In William Shakespeare’s
immortal words: It is nothing but a tale told by an idiot, full of
sound and fury, signifying nothing.”
“Mr Lawan is also said to have uttered that it is left to the
committee to know what to do as he will spring it as a surprise on the
floor of the House! It would be recalled that in the so-called Part 1 of
the alleged conversation between the duo aired Monday on Channels TV,
Mr. Lawan was portrayed as an incoherent, stammering, unsure and
sluggish speaker, who could hardly get out his carefully weighed words.
“This second part has, more than ever before, confirmed Lawan’s worst
fears that the entire audio playback is a doctored, edited piece of
animated voice that does not belong to him and which only forensic
evidence can unravel. He believes that the motives behind the audio are
invidious, insidious and that the entire audio playback of Monday and
Tuesday is of dubious and questionable pedigree,” Ozekhome said.
CJ Yets To Assign Otedola’s Suit To A Judge
Meanwhile, the chief judge of an Abuja High Court, Justice Lawan
Gumi, is yet to assign the suit filed by Otedola asking the court to
order Lawan and three others to pay him N250bn in damages.
According to a source close to an Abuja High Court who confided in
LEADERSHIP, the file for the suit number FCT /3839/2012 and filed on
June 28 was, up until the noon of yesterday, pending on the CJ’s table.
The source added that the CJ is very likely to either assign it to
himself or another Abuja high court judge to handle.
As a matter of routine, it is after it is assigned that the
defendants are served and expected to respond. In addition, the
defendants would be informed of the date to commence hearing of the
case.
Otedola, who is suing along with Zenon Petroleum and Gas Limited as
the first plaintiff, had listed Lawan, the speaker of the House of
Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal, the National Assembly and its clerk as
co-defendants in the suit.
The N250 billion, Otedola said, would compensate him for the loss of
patronage he has suffered as a result of an alleged intimidation by the
National Assembly.
Full List Of Beneficiaries Of FG’s Oil Lifting Contract
A- Nigerian Companies
1. O & O
2. Sahara
3. Taleveras
4. AZenith
5. Masters
6. Mezcor
7. Crudex
8. Voyage oil & Gas
9. Ontario
10. Tocomo
11. Tempo
12. Avidor
13. Lengard
14. Aiteo
15. Moncler
16. Havistar
17. Tridax
18. AMG
19. Eterna
20. Ibeto
Petrochemicals
21. Cento Energy
SOURCE: 4 July 2012.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment